Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.

Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.

603 P.2d 369, 43 Or. App. 489, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 3998
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 3, 1979
DocketNo. A7611-15818, CA 13125
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 603 P.2d 369 (Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc., 603 P.2d 369, 43 Or. App. 489, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 3998 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The sole assignment of error concerns the giving of n instruction which the plaintiff contends was er-oneous. Assuming for the sake of argument that the istruction was not a correct statement of law, and hat error was preserved by a proper objection and ansidering the challenged instruction in the context f the instructions as a whole, we nevertheless affirm. Or Const, Amended Art VII, § 3; ORS 19.125(2).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Utility Equipment, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.
763 P.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
Rambo v. McCulloch
752 P.2d 347 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
Hudson v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
751 P.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 P.2d 369, 43 Or. App. 489, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 3998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collett-v-cascade-health-care-inc-orctapp-1979.