College Theatres, Inc. v. Kaplan
This text of 233 A.D. 870 (College Theatres, Inc. v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for an injunction pendente lite reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. On the facts disclosed, it appears that the purpose of the picketing is to force a breach of the contractual relations entered into between the plaintiff and a rival organization. Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result, being of opinion that on the papers before the court the good faith of the defendant union in its attitude toward the contract between the plaintiff and other unions is questionable. To decide this requires a trial. In the meantime picketing should be stayed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/college-theatres-inc-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1931.