College Park Cemetery Properties Inc. v. Cottongim
This text of 196 S.E. 409 (College Park Cemetery Properties Inc. v. Cottongim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where at an interlocutory hearing an order is granted modifying a previous temporary injunction, a fast writ of error will not lie to that order. Wright v. Thompson, 147 Ga. 500 (94 S. E. 767). In the instant case the most the plaintiff in error can contend for is that the order revoking the former temporary restraining order and granting only part of the relief prayed for was by inference or implication a judgment refusing an interlocutory injunction. “There can be no order or judgment by inference or implication that can be the subject of review by an appellate court.” Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529). Accordingly the writ of error must be Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.E. 409, 185 Ga. 741, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/college-park-cemetery-properties-inc-v-cottongim-ga-1938.