Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt

528 S.W.3d 916

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 26, 2017

DocketED 104966

StatusPublished

This text of 528 S.W.3d 916 (Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt, 528 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Julia Mittelstadt (Mittelstadt) ’ appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to tax or retax court costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s denial of her motion was supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo.' R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Julia Mittelstadt (Mittelstadt) ’ appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to tax or retax court costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s denial of her motion was supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo.' R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2017).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 S.W.3d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collector-of-revenue-v-mittelstadt-moctapp-2017.