Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt

528 S.W.3d 916

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 2017·No. ED 104966·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Julia Mittelstadt (Mittelstadt) ’ appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to tax or retax court costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s denial of her motion was supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo.' R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Julia Mittelstadt (Mittelstadt) ’ appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to tax or retax court costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s denial of her motion was supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo.' R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2017).

Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt, 528 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

528 S.W.3d 916 (Collector of Revenue v. Mittelstadt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.