Collection Co. v. Lewis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collection Co. v. Lewis

447 S.W.3d 217, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1209, 2014 WL 5470840

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2014·No. WD 77189·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Collection Company (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County declaring that Ralph Lewis II (“Respondent”) was entitled to enforce attorney’s fees liens on contingency fees related to a series of rent and possession cases in which Appellant had been assigned the judgments. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Collection Company (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County declaring that Ralph Lewis II (“Respondent”) was entitled to enforce attorney’s fees liens on contingency fees related to a series of rent and possession cases in which Appellant had been assigned the judgments. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Collection Co. v. Lewis, 447 S.W.3d 217, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1209, 2014 WL 5470840 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

447 S.W.3d 217 (Collection Co. v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.