Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Collazo v. State

Collazo v. State

175 So. 3d 935, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14986, 2015 WL 5883661
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 2015
DocketNo. 5D13-4100
StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 3d 935 (Collazo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collazo v. State, 175 So. 3d 935, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14986, 2015 WL 5883661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

[936]*936 ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Falcon v. State, 162 So.3d 954 (Fla.2015), and Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393 (Fla.2015), we withdraw our previously entered opinion and mandate and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida v. Anthony Duwayne Horsley, Jr.
160 So. 3d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Rebecca Lee Falcon v. State of Florida
162 So. 3d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 3d 935, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14986, 2015 WL 5883661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collazo-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.