Collazo v. State
Opinion
Petitioner seeks a Writ of Prohibition based upon the expiration of the statute of limitations on a second-degree felony charge. The trial court denied Petitioner’s *340 motion to dismiss after an evidentiary hearing. Although the crime occurred and a warrant issued in 2000, Petitioner was not arrested on the charge until 2008. Respondent acknowledges that the statute of limitations for the charged crime is three years but urges that the tolling provision of subsection 775.15(6), Florida Statutes (2001), applies. That particular subsection, however, is expressly limited to three years which would only extend the statute to 2006. The Respondent having failed in its burden to show diligence in execution of the warrant before the statute expired, Petitioner is entitled to discharge.
Accordingly, we grant the Writ and order Petitioner’s release on the second-degree felony charge.
Petition for Writ of Prohibition GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
42 So. 3d 339 (Collazo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.