Collazo v. State
This text of 573 So. 2d 209 (Collazo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pedro COLLAZO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Louis Campbell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jorge Espinosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Pedro Collazo, appeals his sentence entered pursuant to the habitual offender statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). We reverse and remand.
Appellant was sentenced as a habitual offender based on two prior felony convictions. Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that the sentence was improper because the two prior convictions arose out of the same criminal episode, and were entered on the same day.
We agree. Convictions entered on the same date, arising from the same criminal episode, are treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Taylor v. State, 558 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Lawley v. State, 556 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Shead v. State, 367 So.2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 209, 1991 WL 7855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collazo-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.