Collazo v. State Division of Human Rights
463 N.E.2d 620, 61 N.Y.2d 957, 475 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4186
This text of 463 N.E.2d 620 (Collazo v. State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Collazo v. State Division of Human Rights, 463 N.E.2d 620, 61 N.Y.2d 957, 475 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4186 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
opinion of the court
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division that the record supports the commission’s determination that the respondent did not discriminate against the petitioner because of his national origin and/or marital status.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
463 N.E.2d 620, 61 N.Y.2d 957, 475 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collazo-v-state-division-of-human-rights-ny-1984.