Collazo v. Progressive Select Insurance Company

Opinion

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Kevin Collazo, Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 20-25302-Civ-Scola Progressive Select Insurance ) Company, Defendant. ) Order Adopting the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations Because no party has objected to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman’s report (ECF No. 145) and the time to do so has passed, the Court adopts Judge Goodman’s report in full, after finding no plain error with it. A district court judge need conduct a de novo review of only “those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636. Where no objections are made, a report may be adopted in full without conducting de novo review provided no plain error exists. E.g., id.; Menendez v. Naples Cmty. Hosp., Inc., No. 2:20-CV-898-SPC- MRM, 2021 WL 5178496, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2021) (collecting cases). Accordingly, the Plaintiff's motion for taxable costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (ECF Nos. 125, 126) is granted in part and denied in part. He is hereby awarded $2,601.60 in taxable costs. However, the Plaintiff's motion for taxable costs under Fla. Stat. § 57.041 is denied. (ECF No. 132.) This case will remain closed. Done and ordered in chambers, at Miami, Florida, on January 6, 2023.

Robert N. Scola, Jr. United States District Judge