Collard v. State
This text of Collard v. State (Collard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
GEORGIA COLLARD,1 § § Defendant Below, § No. 72, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § File No. 1712010437 § Petition No. 18-38121 Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. § §
Submitted: March 4, 2019 Decided: March 8, 2019
Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to
the Court that:
(1) On February 19, 2019, the appellant, Georgia Collard, filed a notice of
appeal from a Family Court order dated and docketed on January 18, 2019. Under
Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(i), a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or
before February 18, 2018.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). (2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Collard to show cause
why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. In response to the notice
to show cause, Collard asserts that the appeal was timely filed because February 17,
2019 was a Sunday and February 18, 2019 was Presidents’ Day. Rule 11(a) provides
that if the last day of a time period prescribed by the rules falls on a Saturday,
Sunday, legal holiday, or other day on which the Clerk’s office is closed, then the
time period shall run until the end of the next day on which the Clerk’s office is
open. As used in Rule 11(a) “‘legal holidays’ shall be those days provided by statute
or appointed by the Governor or the Chief Justice of Delaware.”2 Presidents’ Day
is not designated a legal holiday.3 Collard is correct that January 18, 2019, the day
the Family Court order was entered, is not counted in the computation of time. The
period for appeal therefore began on January 19, 2019, and, because the thirtieth day
was a Sunday, ended on Monday February 18, 2019. The notice of appeal was
untimely filed on Tuesday February 19, 2019.
(3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement.4 A notice of appeal must be
received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period in
2 SUPR. CT. R. 11(a). 3 1 Del. C. § 501 (listing legal holidays); State of Delaware 2019 Holidays, available at https://dhr.delaware.gov/labor/holidays/2019.shtml (same). See also David A. Bramble, Inc. v. Old Republic Gen. Ins. Corp., 2017 WL 1047247 (Del. Mar. 20, 2017) (dismissing an appeal as untimely filed when the last day of the appeal period fell on a Sunday and the notice of appeal was filed the following Tuesday, the day after Presidents’ Day). 4 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).
2 order to be effective.5 Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a
timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel, an untimely appeal
cannot be considered.6
(4) Collard has not demonstrated that her failure to file a timely notice of
appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. Consequently, this case does not
fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice
of appeal. The appeal must be dismissed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),
that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
5 SUPR. CT. R. 10(a). 6 Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collard v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collard-v-state-del-2019.