Collar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collar v. State

813 S.W.2d 61, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 941, 1991 WL 104445

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 1991·No. No. 58823·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Brian Collar, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises for the first time on appeal a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that was not contained in movant’s pro se or amended Rule 24.035 motions. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Brian Collar, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises for the first time on appeal a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that was not contained in movant’s pro se or amended Rule 24.035 motions. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Collar v. State, 813 S.W.2d 61, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 941, 1991 WL 104445 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

813 S.W.2d 61 (Collar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.