Collar v. Collar
919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 2006 WL 120056
Opinion
The father seeks review of an order dismissing a child custody case on the basis of the doctrine of forum non conve-niens, in favor of a pending action in Aruba. We find neither abuse of discretion nor error of law. See § 61.520, Fla. Stat. (2005); Winton-Ibanez v. Ibanez, 690 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Izmery v. Izmery, 559 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Collar v. Collar, 919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 2006 WL 120056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
919 So. 2d 608 (Collar v. Collar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Izmery v. Izmery
559 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Winton-Ibanez v. Ibanez
690 So. 2d 1344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)