Collado v. State

706 So. 2d 940, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1867, 1998 WL 80419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collado v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 776 So. 2d 355
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1998·No. No. 96-02514·Published

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

Collado appeals his convictions for armed burglary of a conveyance, armed grand theft, and grand theft. We affirm his convictions •without discussion. However, we reverse the three-year minimum mandatory portion of his sentence.

Collado was given a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for his armed burglary conviction. In Poiteer v. State, 627 So.2d 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), this court held that section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1993), requires actual physical possession before a minimum mandatory term may be imposed for possession of a firearm. Here, there is no evidence in the record that Collado possessed a firearm. Therefore, the imposition of the three-year minimum mandatory sentence was improper.

Accordingly, we affirm Collado’s convictions and reverse the three-year minimum mandatory sentence for his armed burglary conviction. His sentences are otherwise affirmed.

. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collado v. State, 706 So. 2d 940, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1867, 1998 WL 80419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 940 (Collado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poiteer v. State
627 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)