Colladay's Estate
This text of 32 Pa. D. & C. 644 (Colladay's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exceptions filed by the guardian ad litem raise two questions: (1) Whether the learned auditing judge erred in holding the trust before him void as a violation of the rule against perpetuities; and (2) whether the learned auditing judge erred in passing on the question at this time.
[648]*648A careful examination of the adjudication, as well as consideration of the briefs filed, has led us to the conviction that the learned auditing judge has correctly applied the principles under the authorities cited by him in his satisfactory adjudication, all of which have been most recently reviewed in Quigley’s Estate, 329 Pa. 281.
Accordingly, all exceptions are dismissed, and the adjudication is confirmed absolutely.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Pa. D. & C. 644, 1938 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colladays-estate-paorphctphilad-1938.