Colladay's Estate

32 Pa. D. & C. 644, 1938 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 310
Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County·Decided June 3, 1938·No. no. 415·Published

Opinion

Ladner, J.,

The exceptions filed by the guardian ad litem raise two questions: (1) Whether the learned auditing judge erred in holding the trust before him void as a violation of the rule against perpetuities; and (2) whether the learned auditing judge erred in passing on the question at this time.

[648] A careful examination of the adjudication, as well as consideration of the briefs filed, has led us to the conviction that the learned auditing judge has correctly applied the principles under the authorities cited by him in his satisfactory adjudication, all of which have been most recently reviewed in Quigley’s Estate, 329 Pa. 281.

Accordingly, all exceptions are dismissed, and the adjudication is confirmed absolutely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colladay's Estate, 32 Pa. D. & C. 644, 1938 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 310 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1938).

32 Pa. D. & C. 644 (Colladay's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quigley's Estate
198 A. 85 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)