Collab9 LLC v. En Pointe Technologies Sales, LLC
This text of Collab9 LLC v. En Pointe Technologies Sales, LLC (Collab9 LLC v. En Pointe Technologies Sales, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COLLABS9, LLC,
Plaintiff/ Counterclaim Defendant,
V. : C.A. NO. N16C-12-032 MMJ CCLD
EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES, LLC and PCM, INC.,
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs/ Third-Party Plaintiffs.
Counterclaim Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs,
Vv.
COLLAB3S, LLC and ATTIAZAZ MUNAWAR DIN,
Counterclaim Defendant and
Submitted: May 5, 2020 Decided: May 15, 2020
On The PCM Parties’ Motion for Entry of an Order Governing the Production and Exchange of Confidential and Highly Confidential Information ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Motion, Opposition and Cross-Motion. The Court finds that a two-tiered confidentiality order will not create severe obstacles for the parties and their counsel. Additionally compelling circumstances warrant protection of
certain highly confidential information.
To ensure that counsel] are able to fully consult with their clients, the Court directs the parties to confer and submit a proposed order incorporating a provision permitting counsel to share Highly Confidential information with one or more select client
liaisons.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Hoftorable Mary M. Johnston
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collab9 LLC v. En Pointe Technologies Sales, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collab9-llc-v-en-pointe-technologies-sales-llc-delsuperct-2020.