Coliseum Hotel Associates v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2

203 A.D.2d 315, 610 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758

This text of 203 A.D.2d 315 (Coliseum Hotel Associates v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coliseum Hotel Associates v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2, 203 A.D.2d 315, 610 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment directing the defendants Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau and the County of Nassau to refund any excess real property taxes paid by the plaintiff as a result of certain school district resolutions purporting to opt [316]*316out of the tax exemptions provided by RPTL 485-b, which were held to be invalid by the Court of Appeals (see, Matter of Walker v Board of Assessors, 66 NY2d 702), (1) the defendants Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau and the County of Nassau appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), entered September 23, 1991, which, upon remittitur from this Court, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) the plaintiff cross appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the same order and judgment as failed to correct its taxable assessment for the 1983/ 1984 tax year and failed to order a corresponding refund, with interest.

Ordered that the appeal of the defendants Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau and the County of Nassau is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellants-respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

We decline to consider the plaintiff’s contentions since they were already decided by this Court on the previous appeal (see, Coliseum Hotel Assocs. v Uniondale Union Free School Dist. No. 2, 153 AD2d 654, affd on other grounds 80 NY2d 961). This Court’s previous determination of those contentions is now the law of the case (see, Corporate Prop. Investors v Board of Assessors, 203 AD2d 317 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Board of Assessors
487 N.E.2d 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Bowery Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors of the County of Nassa
80 N.Y.2d 961 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Coliseum Hotel Associates v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2
153 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Corporate Property Investors v. Board of Assessors
203 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 315, 610 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coliseum-hotel-associates-v-uniondale-union-free-school-district-no-2-nyappdiv-1994.