Colinares v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colinares v. Washington

269 A.D.2d 350, 702 N.Y.S.2d 570, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1270

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 350 (Colinares v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colinares v. Washington, 269 A.D.2d 350, 702 N.Y.S.2d 570, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1270 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated February 22, 1999, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Berlinda Colinares did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

[351]*351Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Loiseau v Maxwell, 256 AD2d 450; Edwards v De Haven, 155 AD2d 757; Post v Broderick, 104 AD2d 977). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated February 22, 1999, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Berlinda Colinares did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

[351]*351Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Loiseau v Maxwell, 256 AD2d 450; Edwards v De Haven, 155 AD2d 757; Post v Broderick, 104 AD2d 977). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 350, 702 N.Y.S.2d 570, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colinares-v-washington-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack