Colin O'Kroley v. Sherwin-Williams Company Inc. (An Ohio Corporation)

Court of Appeals of Texas

Colin O'Kroley v. Sherwin-Williams Company Inc. (An Ohio Corporation)

DecidedOctober 17, 2024

Docket11-17-00339-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Colin O'Kroley v. Sherwin-Williams Company Inc. (An Ohio Corporation) (Colin O'Kroley v. Sherwin-Williams Company Inc. (An Ohio Corporation)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colin O'Kroley v. Sherwin-Williams Company Inc. (An Ohio Corporation), (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion filed October 17, 2024

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-17-00339-CV __________

COLIN O’KROLEY, Appellant V. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY INC. (AN OHIO CORPORATION), Appellee

On Appeal from the 358th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-131,720

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Colin O’Kroley, filed a premature pro se notice of appeal on December 11, 2017. We abated the appeal to permit the trial court to enter a final appealable order or judgment. We reinstated the case on April 30, 2024, upon receipt of three documents from the trial court clerk entitled: (1) Joint Notice of Settlement; (2) Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice; and (3) Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. According to those filings, the parties agreed to a settlement, and the trial court granted their joint motion to dismiss the case, thereby resolving the lawsuit. On April 30, June 4, and July 19, the clerk of this court requested that Appellant verify whether “the lawsuit has truly been resolved,” informing him that, if so, “a motion to dismiss the appeal would be appropriate.” On September 10, 2024, we received a “Joint Stipulation of Dismissal” confirming that the parties reached a settlement on March 25, and requesting that we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). An attorney executed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal on behalf of Appellant. Acting pro se, Appellant later sent an e-mail to the clerk of this court on September 17 in which he asked a question about the attorney that executed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, expressed concerns regarding the settlement, and suggested that he wished to pursue this appeal. We instructed Appellant to respond to the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal by October 4, 2024, and further informed him that we could not provide legal advice. We also forwarded Appellant’s correspondence to Appellee and Appellant’s counsel of record, and requested responses by September 27. Our requests have gone unanswered. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ agreed motion and dismiss this appeal.

JOHN M. BAILEY CHIEF JUSTICE October 17, 2024 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Trotter, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion filed October 17, 2024

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-17-00339-CV __________

COLIN O’KROLEY, Appellant V. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY INC. (AN OHIO CORPORATION), Appellee

On Appeal from the 358th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-131,720

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Colin O’Kroley, filed a premature pro se notice of appeal on December 11, 2017. We abated the appeal to permit the trial court to enter a final appealable order or judgment. We reinstated the case on April 30, 2024, upon receipt of three documents from the trial court clerk entitled: (1) Joint Notice of Settlement; (2) Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice; and (3) Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. According to those filings, the parties agreed to a settlement, and the trial court granted their joint motion to dismiss the case, thereby resolving the lawsuit. On April 30, June 4, and July 19, the clerk of this court requested that Appellant verify whether “the lawsuit has truly been resolved,” informing him that, if so, “a motion to dismiss the appeal would be appropriate.” On September 10, 2024, we received a “Joint Stipulation of Dismissal” confirming that the parties reached a settlement on March 25, and requesting that we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). An attorney executed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal on behalf of Appellant. Acting pro se, Appellant later sent an e-mail to the clerk of this court on September 17 in which he asked a question about the attorney that executed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, expressed concerns regarding the settlement, and suggested that he wished to pursue this appeal. We instructed Appellant to respond to the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal by October 4, 2024, and further informed him that we could not provide legal advice. We also forwarded Appellant’s correspondence to Appellee and Appellant’s counsel of record, and requested responses by September 27. Our requests have gone unanswered. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ agreed motion and dismiss this appeal.

JOHN M. BAILEY CHIEF JUSTICE October 17, 2024 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Trotter, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment. 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Colin O'Kroley v. Sherwin-Williams Company Inc. (An Ohio Corporation), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colin-okroley-v-sherwin-williams-company-inc-an-ohio-corporation-texapp-2024.