Colichio v. Colichio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colichio v. Colichio

92 A.D.2d 908, 460 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 908 (Colichio v. Colichio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colichio v. Colichio, 92 A.D.2d 908, 460 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce, she appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated September 28, 1981, as granted the defendant husband’s motion to modify the judgment of divorce so as to provide for termination of the wife’s exclusive possession and occupancy of the former marital home. Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Calendar Term of Special Term, Part V, for assignment and for further proceedings in accordance herewith. On the facts of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to modify the judgment of divorce, without a hearing, so as to provide for termination of the wife’s exclusive possession and occupancy of the former marital home. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce, she appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated September 28, 1981, as granted the defendant husband’s motion to modify the judgment of divorce so as to provide for termination of the wife’s exclusive possession and occupancy of the former marital home. Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Calendar Term of Special Term, Part V, for assignment and for further proceedings in accordance herewith. On the facts of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to modify the judgment of divorce, without a hearing, so as to provide for termination of the wife’s exclusive possession and occupancy of the former marital home. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 908, 460 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colichio-v-colichio-nyappdiv-1983.