Colgate v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
This text of 122 A.D. 908 (Colgate v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment modified sti far as to permit the defendant to enforce subdivision. K of rule .14, on the. ground that there is not sufficient evidence to show that said rule is hot reasonably necessary to insure the safe management of the defendants trains, and as thus modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs.- Jenks,' Gaynor, .Rich and Miller,, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., voted to affirm without modification.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colgate-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1907.