Colgate v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

122 A.D. 908

This text of 122 A.D. 908 (Colgate v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colgate v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 122 A.D. 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Judgment modified sti far as to permit the defendant to enforce subdivision. K of rule .14, on the. ground that there is not sufficient evidence to show that said rule is hot reasonably necessary to insure the safe management of the defendants trains, and as thus modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs.- Jenks,' Gaynor, .Rich and Miller,, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., voted to affirm without modification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colgate-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1907.