Colgate-Palmolive Peet Co. v. Coe
This text of 144 F.2d 517 (Colgate-Palmolive Peet Co. v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint in this case attempts to state a cause of action under Section 4915, R.S., 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, and asks the court to authorize and direct the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to plaintiff. The record, however, shows and plaintiff admits that all the claims involved are copied [518]*518from two other patents for the purpose of provoking interference proceedings and that no patent can be authorized until those proceedings are determined.
The dismissal of the complaint by the court below will be affirmed on the authority of Hoover Co. v. Coe, -U.S.App.D.C. -, 144 F.2d 514.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 F.2d 517, 79 U.S. App. D.C. 175, 62 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 121, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colgate-palmolive-peet-co-v-coe-cadc-1944.