Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

510 U.S. 943
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 1, 1993·No. 92-1839·Published

Opinion

510 U.S. 943

Colgate-Palmolive Co.
v.
Franchise Tax Board of California.

No. 92-1839.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 1, 1993.

Appeal from the Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist.

Motion of Government of the United Kingdom and Committee on State Taxation et al. for leave to file supplemental briefs as amici curiae in No. 92-1384 denied. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument. Reported below: No. 92-1384, 10 Cal. App. 4th 1742, 14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537; No. 92-1839, 10 Cal. App. 4th 1768, 13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 761.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 510 U.S. 943 (1993).

510 U.S. 943 (Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barclays Bank International Limited v. Franchise Tax Board
10 Cal. App. 4th 1742 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
10 Cal. App. 4th 1768 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)