Colfield v. State
This text of 153 S.E. 92 (Colfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the facts of the ease, the failure of the court to charge the law of assault and battery was not error. .
2. In the trial of a criminal case the jurors are the only and final arbiters of the facts, and when a case reaches this court, where no error of law has been committed on the trial arid the trial judge has approved the verdict, and it is supported by any evidence, however slight, this court is powerless to interfere. The verdict is supported by evidence and is approved by the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 S.E. 92, 41 Ga. App. 375, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colfield-v-state-gactapp-1930.