Coley v. Smith
This text of 162 S.E.2d 216 (Coley v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, in his brief, has failed completely to comply with Rules 17 (a) (1) and 17 (c) (3) (A), which were effective August 1, 1965. III Ga. App. 883, 890. Accordingly the enumeration of errors not being supported by references to the record as therein provided will be considered as abandoned, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed. See Strickland v. English, 115 Ga. App. 384 (2) (154 SE2d 710).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.E.2d 216, 117 Ga. App. 822, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coley-v-smith-gactapp-1968.