Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Coley v. Smith

Coley v. Smith

162 S.E.2d 216, 117 Ga. App. 822, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 17, 1968·No. 43619·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

The appellant, in his brief, has failed completely to comply with Rules 17 (a) (1) and 17 (c) (3) (A), which were effective August 1, 1965. III Ga. App. 883, 890. Accordingly the enumeration of errors not being supported by references to the record as therein provided will be considered as abandoned, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed. See Strickland v. English, 115 Ga. App. 384 (2) (154 SE2d 710).

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur. *823 C. C. Crockett, A. L. Hatcher, for appellants. Milton Harrison, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coley v. Smith, 162 S.E.2d 216, 117 Ga. App. 822, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

162 S.E.2d 216 (Coley v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Home Indemnity Company v. Godley
177 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Burchfield v. Byers
173 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Georgia Stainless Steel Corp. v. Bacon
170 S.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Allen v. Carter
168 S.E.2d 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)