Coley v. . Ballance

60 N.C. 634
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 N.C. 634 (Coley v. . Ballance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coley v. . Ballance, 60 N.C. 634 (N.C. 1864).

Opinion

All of the property embraced in the legacies which lapsed by the death of the legatees falls into the residue. This is the general rule, and there is nothing to take this case out of its application.

2. The cattle and increase fall into the residue, subject to the estate of Ruffin Ballance, until Tawboro would have been 21 years (636) old, if he had lived.

3. The interest of Francis Allgood Ballance in the beds and bedsteads does not survive, but falls into the residue. The effect of the act of the Legislature abolishing survivorship among joint tenants is to change the rule which had in bequests of this kind allowed the whole to pass to the surviving legatee.

Decree according to this opinion; costs to be paid by the executor out of the estate.

Cited: Mabrey v. Stafford, 88 N.C. 604.

NOTE. — Upon the death (before the testator) of a residuary legatee, the real and personal estate given to him lapses for the benefit of the testator's heirs and next of kin. Robinson v. McIver, 63 N.C. 645. *Page 418

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stevenson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
161 S.E. 728 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.C. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coley-v-ballance-nc-1864.