Coley Jr., Tommy Willis v. State
Opinion
Order issued December14, 2012
In The Tourt of Appratz JTifthi Diztrirt uf&'rxas at Dallas
No. 05-11-01317-CR
TOMMY COLEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
ORDER
Before Justices Richter, Lang-Miers, and Myers
We REINSTATE this appeal. We VACATE our order of December 7, 2012 ordering the
trial court to determine whether appellant's amended motion for new trial was filed before or after
the court overruled appellant's original motion for new trial.
In his fourth issue on appeal, appellant contends the trial court should have held a hearing
on his amended motion for new trial, styled "Second Motion for New Trial and Motion in Arrest of
Judgment," filed on October 21, 2011. We agree. In this situation, the appropriate remedy is to
abate the appeal and order the trial court to conduct a hearing on the amended motion for new trial.
Hobbs v. State, 298 S.W.3d 193, 203 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Accordingly, we REMAND the case
to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing on appellant's amended motion
for new trial. See Hobbs, 298 S.W.3d at 200-203 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Clarke v. State, 270 S.W.3d 573, 580-81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); State v. Moore, 225 S.W.3d 556, 568-570 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2007). We further ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental reporter's record
from the hearing and a supplemental clerk's record containing the order ruling on the amended
motion for new trial to this Court within THIRTY (30) days of the date of this order.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above orders. The appeal
• shall be reinstated thirty (30) days from the date of this order or when the supplemental records are
received, whichever is earlier.
LANA MYERS PRESIDIN'G JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coley Jr., Tommy Willis v. State (Coley Jr., Tommy Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.