Colette Ferrell v. Midfirst Bank
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 19, 2015
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00068-CV
COLETTE FERRELL, Appellant V. MIDFIRST BANK, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00014-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By electronically-delivered postcard dated
September 2, 2015, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed
appellant to file both her brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant
that failure to file her brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal
without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, an extension motion, or
otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of her brief.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).
/Carolyn Wright/ 150068F.P05 CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
COLETTE FERRELL, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00068-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00014-E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. MIDFIRST BANK, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee MIDFIRST BANK recover its costs of this appeal from appellant COLETTE FERRELL.
Judgment entered November 19, 2015.
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colette Ferrell v. Midfirst Bank (Colette Ferrell v. Midfirst Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.