Coles v. Vanneman

51 N.J. Eq. 323
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coles v. Vanneman, 51 N.J. Eq. 323 (N.J. 1893).

51 N.J. Eq. 323 (Coles v. Vanneman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Egan v. Egan
131 A. 129 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)