Coles v. Vanneman
51 N.J. Eq. 323
This text of 51 N.J. Eq. 323 (Coles v. Vanneman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coles v. Vanneman, 51 N.J. Eq. 323 (N.J. 1893).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith — 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Egan v. Egan
131 A. 129 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 N.J. Eq. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coles-v-vanneman-nj-1893.