Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

53 A. 1125, 68 N.J.L. 413, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 176
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 17, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in that court, reported as Coles v. Midland Telephone and Telegraph Co. 38 Vroom 490.

[414]*414For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins, Fort, Garretson,_ Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Yredenburgh, Yoori-iees, Yroom. 12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co., 53 A. 1125, 68 N.J.L. 413, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 176 (N.J. 1902).

53 A. 1125 (Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borough of Merchantville v. Malik & Son (072255)
95 A.3d 709 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014)
State v. Rowland
444 A.2d 1123 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)