Coles v. Inhabitants of Revere

63 N.E. 430, 181 Mass. 175, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 811
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 2, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hammond, J.

Upon the evidence, the questions whether the horse was driven with due care, whether the way was defective by reason of the absence of a barrier, whether the loss of control of the horse was only momentary and would have been instantly regained if the vehicle had not reached the defective spot, and the accident, if there had been a proper barrier, would have been avoided, and whether the defect was the sole cause of the injury, were all for the jury. There was no error in the manner in which the court dealt with the rulings requested by the de[178]*178fendant. The instructions under which the case was submitted to the jury were full and correct. Hinckley v. Somerset, 145 Mass. 326. Tisdale v. Bridgewater, 167 Mass. 248, 250.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coles v. Inhabitants of Revere, 63 N.E. 430, 181 Mass. 175, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 811 (Mass. 1902).

63 N.E. 430 (Coles v. Inhabitants of Revere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMahon v. Inhabitants of Harvard
99 N.E. 458 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Meaney v. City of Boston
80 N.E. 522 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)