Coles v. Everett

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2009
Docket08-8417
StatusUnpublished

This text of Coles v. Everett (Coles v. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coles v. Everett, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8417

COREY COLES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

D. B. EVERETT; JOHN JABE; GENE JOHNSON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00225-RGD-FBS)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Coles, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Coles appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice Coles’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition for failure to comply with an order of the court. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Coles’s motions for appointment of counsel

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Coles v. Everett, No. 2:08-cv-00225-RGD-FBS (E.D. Va. Oct. 22,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Coles v. Everett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coles-v-everett-ca4-2009.