Coles v. Alpha Publishing Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Coles v. Alpha Publishing Co.

19 Ohio Law. Abs. 617, 1935 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1190

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 1935

DocketNo 2547

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Ohio Law. Abs. 617 (Coles v. Alpha Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coles v. Alpha Publishing Co., 19 Ohio Law. Abs. 617, 1935 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1190 (Ohio Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By BARNES, PJ.

This is the order upon which the error proceeding ¿to thi§ court is predicated.

It is clearly apparent and self evident from the mere reading of the journal entry that the order is temporary and not final.

The Supreme Court of Ohio has definitely decided the question here involved in two cases, each of which is identical in their facts and determinative of the question here involved. The last pronouncement is in the case of Jones, Treas. v The First National Bank of Bellaire, 123 Oh St, p. 642. The syllabus reads as follows:

“An order of the Court of Common Pleas overruling a motion to vacate a temporary injunction in a suit in which the ultimate relief sought' is an injunction, is neither a judgment nor final order which may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals on a petition in error.”

The case of May Company v Bailey Company, 81 Oh St, 471, is cited, approved and followed. The syllabus in the May case is identical in its substance with the later case reported in 123 Oh St, supra.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

Exceptions will be allowed.

Entry may be drawn accordingly.

HORNBECK and BODEY, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI