Colen-Gruhn Co. v. 1133 Washington, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colen-Gruhn Co. v. 1133 Washington, Inc.

250 A.D. 786, 294 N.Y.S. 551, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9006

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order restraining appellant from interfering with the receiver’s possession and directing appellant to deliver to the receiver a statement showing the tenants in the premises and the rents due from them, etc., in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, -with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The assignment, which antedated the order appointing the receiver, was intended by the parties to be absolute and unqualified, operating in praesenti, and conferred upon appellant an unquestionable right against the subsequent receivership. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order restraining appellant from interfering with the receiver’s possession and directing appellant to deliver to the receiver a statement showing the tenants in the premises and the rents due from them, etc., in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, -with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The assignment, which antedated the order appointing the receiver, was intended by the parties to be absolute and unqualified, operating in praesenti, and conferred upon appellant an unquestionable right against the subsequent receivership. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Colen-Gruhn Co. v. 1133 Washington, Inc., 250 A.D. 786, 294 N.Y.S. 551, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 786 (Colen-Gruhn Co. v. 1133 Washington, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related