Coleman v. Way

Suffolk County Court

Coleman v. Way

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 986

New York County Court, Suffolk County·Decided January 28, 1678·Published

Opinion

Wm Coleman Attourny to Martha Emery the Attourny of Thomas Emery her husband plaint. conta Richard Way & John Jndicott Defendts in an action of the case for not paying the Summe of two hundred and Ninety two pounds due according to a bond or writing dated. 31° October 1677. under theire hands and Seales with damages. . . . The Iury . . . found for the plaintife forfiture of the bond of two hundred ninety two pounds & costs of Court: The Defendt moved for a chancery & makeing it appeare to the Court that they had paid out the whole Estate according to the condicion of sd bond The Magistrates chancered this forfiture to nothing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wm Coleman Attourny to Martha Emery the Attourny of Thomas Emery her husband plaint. conta Richard Way & John Jndicott Defendts in an action of the case for not paying the Summe of two hundred and Ninety two pounds due according to a bond or writing dated. 31° October 1677. under theire hands and Seales with damages. . . . The Iury . . . found for the plaintife forfiture of the bond of two hundred ninety two pounds & costs of Court: The Defendt moved for a chancery & makeing it appeare to the Court that they had paid out the whole Estate according to the condicion of sd bond The Magistrates chancered this forfiture to nothing.

Coleman v. Way, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 986 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1678).

Pincite

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 986 (Coleman v. Way) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.