Coleman v. URS Corp.

2019 NY Slip Op 8484
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2019
Docket10397 156959/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 8484 (Coleman v. URS Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. URS Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 8484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Coleman v URS Corp. (2019 NY Slip Op 08484)
Coleman v URS Corp.
2019 NY Slip Op 08484
Decided on November 21, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 21, 2019
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Webber, Kern, JJ.

10397 156959/13

[*1] Francis Coleman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Siobhan Coleman, Plaintiff,

v

URS Corporation, et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Michael H. Zhu of counsel), for appellant.

Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP, New York (Jonathan P. Shaub of counsel), for respondents.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered October 5, 2017, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissing the complaint as against defendant URS Corporation-New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record demonstrates conclusively that defendant URS Corporation-New York, the program manager on the construction site where plaintiff was injured, did not have the authority to supervise and control the injury-producing work and was therefore not a statutory agent of the project owner or general contractor for purposes of the Labor Law (Santos v Condo 124 LLC, 161 AD3d 650, 653 [1st Dept 2018]; DaSilva v Haks Engrs., Architects & Land Surveyors, P.C., 125 AD3d 480, 481 [1st Dept 2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 21, 2019

DEPUTY CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DaSilva v. Haks Engineers, Architects & Land Surveyors
125 A.D.3d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 8484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-urs-corp-nyappdiv-2019.