Coleman v. United States

215 F.2d 681, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 311
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 1954
DocketNos. 12076, 12077
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 F.2d 681 (Coleman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coleman v. United States, 215 F.2d 681, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 311 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were jointly indicted under § 22-1506, D.C.Code (1951), for unlawfully dealing, playing and practicing upon one Raymond Smith the confidence game and swindle known as three-card monte. They appeal from their conviction contending, inter alia, that the court erroneously admitted in evidence certain articles seized by the arresting officers at the time of arrest. A motion to suppress this evidence, filed pursuant to Rule 41 (e), Fed.R.Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C., was denied.

Whether the crime charged is a misdemeanor because so designated by § 22-1506, supra, or is a felony because punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, see 18 U.S.C. § 1 (1952), we think the evidence as to what the officers saw transpiring justified them in making the arrest without a warrant. The articles seized as an incident to the valid arrest were accordingly not inadmissible in evidence.

In other respects as well the appellants were fairly tried and convicted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 F.2d 681, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-united-states-cadc-1954.