Coleman v. Tucker

Fourth Circuit

Coleman v. Tucker

127 F. App'x 112

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2005·No. No. 04-7966·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dion Wyvis Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. Tucker, No. CA-03-131-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 16, 2004 & entered Nov. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dion Wyvis Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. Tucker, No. CA-03-131-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 16, 2004 & entered Nov. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Coleman v. Tucker, 127 F. App'x 112 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

127 F. App'x 112 (Coleman v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related