Coleman v. Toop

Ohio Supreme Court

Coleman v. Toop

1 Wright 315, 1 Ohio Ch. 315

DecidedJune 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 315 (Coleman v. Toop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Toop, 1 Wright 315, 1 Ohio Ch. 315 (Ohio 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

WRIGHT, J.

If there is any claim in the complainant, it is a legal claim. If either the deed or the will is valid, they are so at law, and will constitute a defence to the ejectment suit. But the case is not for hearing. The paper called a plea and demurrer, we can take no notice of; such papers are poor apologies for carelessness, and degrade the profession. The paper maybe struck off the files, and the injunction dissolved-. Continued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIGHT, J.

If there is any claim in the complainant, it is a legal claim. If either the deed or the will is valid, they are so at law, and will constitute a defence to the ejectment suit. But the case is not for hearing. The paper called a plea and demurrer, we can take no notice of; such papers are poor apologies for carelessness, and degrade the profession. The paper maybe struck off the files, and the injunction dissolved-. Continued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 315, 1 Ohio Ch. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-toop-ohio-1833.