Coleman v. Ted's Auto Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coleman v. Ted's Auto Sales, Inc.

17 A.D.2d 827, 233 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7826

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 A.D.2d 827 (Coleman v. Ted's Auto Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Ted's Auto Sales, Inc., 17 A.D.2d 827, 233 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for injunctive relief and for damages pursuant to statute (Civil Rights Law, § 51), the defendants-third-party-plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 30, 1962, which (1) denied their cross motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint, and which granted the third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint; and (2) from a judgment of said court, entered April 3,1962 on said order, dismissing the third-party complaint. Order and judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur. [33 Mise 2d 739.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for injunctive relief and for damages pursuant to statute (Civil Rights Law, § 51), the defendants-third-party-plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 30, 1962, which (1) denied their cross motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint, and which granted the third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint; and (2) from a judgment of said court, entered April 3,1962 on said order, dismissing the third-party complaint. Order and judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur. [33 Mise 2d 739.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 827, 233 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-teds-auto-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack