Coleman v. Sutton
This text of 355 F. App'x 566 (Coleman v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[567]*567 SUMMARY ORDER
Derrick Coleman appeals from the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants Reginald Sutton and Tamela Welburn. Coleman alleges that defendants violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for raising oral complaints regarding the medical care they provided him. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See Coleman v. Sutton, 530 F.Supp.2d 451 (W.D.N.Y.2008).
Finding no merit in Coleman’s remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F. App'x 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-sutton-ca2-2009.