Coleman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coleman v. State

567 S.W.3d 306

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 195 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 2019·No. ED 106060·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mario Coleman (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mario Coleman (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Coleman v. State, 567 S.W.3d 306 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

567 S.W.3d 306 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.