Coleman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coleman v. State

567 S.W.3d 306

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 19, 2019

DocketED 106060

StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.3d 306 (Coleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. State, 567 S.W.3d 306 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mario Coleman (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mario Coleman (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-state-moctapp-2019.