Coleman v. State
916 So. 2d 54, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19774, 2005 WL 3408034
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 956 So. 2d 1254 →
Opinion
William Edward Coleman appeals his convictions for kidnapping, robbery, battery and trespass. The sole claim of error is that the trial court should not have admitted certain statements made by the victim under the hearsay exemption for excited utterances. We affirm on authority of Bell v. State, 847 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review denied, 859 So.2d 513 (Fla.2003).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. State, 916 So. 2d 54, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19774, 2005 WL 3408034 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
916 So. 2d 54 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. State
847 So. 2d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)