Coleman v. State
790 So. 2d 576, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10348, 2001 WL 832588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 2001·No. No. 3D01-1656·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). As in Major we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA- IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Affirmed; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. State, 790 So. 2d 576, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10348, 2001 WL 832588 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
790 So. 2d 576 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saunders v. State
804 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)