Coleman v. State

414 So. 2d 20, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19999
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 841
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 1982·No. No. 81-1579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed.

However, we remand this case to the trial court to correct imperfections in the judgment and sentence. The judgment and sentence recite that appellant was tried and found guilty of assault and battery. Since appellant was initially placed on probation for burglary of a conveyance, the judgment and sentence must be corrected to show that probation for burglary was revoked and that appellant entered a plea of guilty to that burglary. Chester v. State, 355 So.2d 509 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence; otherwise, affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 414 So. 2d 20, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

414 So. 2d 20 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chester v. State
355 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)