Coleman v. State
251 So. 2d 154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 So. 2d 96 →
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the order denying his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence, entered upon his guilty plea, for the offense of escape from lawful confinement.
Our examination of the record and consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties indicate that no reversible error was committed in arriving at the judgment appealed herein. Horton v. Mayo, 153 Fla. 611, 15 So.2d 327 (1943); State v. Hickman, 189 So.2d 254 (Fla.App.2nd, 1966). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. State, 251 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
251 So. 2d 154 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hickman
189 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Horton v. Mayo
15 So. 2d 327 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)