Coleman v. State

193 So. 2d 6, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1966·No. No. 65-821·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of the defendant’s motion for relief brought pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A., Chapter 924, Appendix.

Defendant was indicted for the crime of rape. At arraignment he entered a plea of not guilty. The cause came on for trial and prior to the conclusion of the state’s case the defendant changed his plea to guilty. He was adjudged guilty of the crime of rape and sentenced to confinement in the state prison for the term of his natural life.

In response to defendant’s motion, a full evidentiary hearing was held at which the defendant was present and testified. After receiving testimony and hearing argument of counsel concerning defendant’s allegations that his privately employed counsel was incompetent and that he was coerced into changing his plea from not guilty to guilty, the trial judge denied the motion.

The evidence supports the trial judge’s conclusions and therefore, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 193 So. 2d 6, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4691 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

193 So. 2d 6 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.