Coleman v. State ex rel. Maher

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1913·No. No. 13523·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed for reasons stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed; this court finding that the statute in question was valid and constitutional, but that the plaintiffs in error in this court are not entitled to the relief prayed for. It is further ordered and adjudged that the said plaintiffs in error pay the costs herein, and that this cause be remanded to the court of common pleas to carry this judgment into execution.

Shauck, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State ex rel. Maher, 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 (Ohio 1913).

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 (Coleman v. State ex rel. Maher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.