Coleman v. State
This text of Coleman v. State (Coleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DEVIN COLEMAN, § § No. 301, 2015 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for Kent County § Cr. ID Nos. 1303004663 and Plaintiff Below, § 1303012706 Appellee. §
Submitted: June 29, 2015 Decided: July 17, 2015
ORDER
This 17th day of July 2015, it appears to the Court that, on June 15, 2015, the
appellant filed an appeal from a Superior Court Commissioner’s order denying his
motion for recusal. The Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal
should not be dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory
criminal appeal. The appellant failed to respond within the required ten-day
period; 1 therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice 1 We acknowledge Coleman’s untimely response filed on July 6. Even if the Court were to consider his untimely filing, it would not change the outcome.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coleman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-state-del-2015.