Coleman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Coleman v. State

856 S.W.2d 306, 313 Ark. 716, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 427

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 5, 1993

DocketCR 93-676

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 856 S.W.2d 306 (Coleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. State, 856 S.W.2d 306, 313 Ark. 716, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 427 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Maurice Coleman, by his attorney, Bill E. Ross, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 212 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Maurice Coleman, by his attorney, Bill E. Ross, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 212 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

856 S.W.2d 306, 313 Ark. 716, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-state-ark-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack